3 September 2010    Login
Library

ANA in the News
Bombplex 2030 Overview
published Thursday, May 10, 2007  4997 Views :: 1 Comments

On October 19, 2006, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), the semi-autonomous nuclear weapons agency within the Department of Energy (DOE), published a formal Notice of Intent to build “Complex 2030,” the nuclear weapons complex of the future. If allowed to move forward, this new Bombplex will design new nuclear weapons and resume industrial-scale bomb production.

How did we get here?
This process began in 1996. Under a program called Stockpile Stewardship, the Department of Energy was consolidating and transforming its nuclear weapons complex without adequate public involvement. Only after threat of citizen litigation did DOE complete a “Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS).”

The 1996 PEIS established “interim” production of plutonium pits, the central cores of nuclear weapons, at New Mexico’s Los Alamos Lab. Pit production had been halted in 1989 after the Rocky Flats Plant near Denver was shut down following a FBI raid investigating environmental crimes. Since 1996, NNSA has proposed various “supplements” to the 1996 Stockpile Stewardship and Management PEIS, most notably for a “Modern Pit Facility” designed to produce up to 450 pits per year. NNSA has now cancelled the Modern Pit Facility and instead is initiating this Complex 2030 Supplemental PEIS (or “SEIS”). In it, NNSA proposes a minimum production capacity of 125 pits per year at a future Consolidated Plutonium Center to be built at one of five candidate sites.A plutonium sphere the size of this glass ball destroyed the city of Nagasaki

 

Does the U.S. Need a New Plutonium Bomb Plant?  NO!


The U.S. already has too many warheads and plutonium pits and needs to ramp up dismantlement, not increase plutonium pit production.  In addition, the recently released Plutonium Pit Lifetime study estimates that most primary types will last at least one hundred years – undermining the need for new nuclear weapons.


 

DC Days 2010


The US Nuclear Weapons Complex


Concrete Treaty-Based Steps to Reduce the Nuclear Threat


Cleaning Up the Nuclear Legacy


No Nuclear Power Bailout


Reprocessing and Plutonium - Not the Basis for Clean Energy


DC Days 2009


-Complex Transformation Wrong Policy, Wrong Priority, Wrong Direction


-Halting Unnecessary Nuclear Weapons Production


-Towards a Nuclear Weapons Free World


-Reprocessing and Plutonium Fuel Are Not Clean Energy


-Cleaning up the Nuclear Weapons Legacy


-Protecting the Environment from Nuclear Waste and Power

 

-Plutonium "Triggers" for Nuclear Bombs

 

-Permanently Ending Nuclear Testing

 

-Plutonium Disposition Remains in Disarray

 

-Radiation Standards



DC Days 2008

-Environmental Cleanup of the Nuclear Weapons Complex

-Spent Fuel Reprocessing and the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership

-Proposed Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository

-Plutonium Disposition: Vitrification vs. MOX Reactor Fuel

-The Reliable Replacement Warhead Program and "Complex Transformation"

-Nuclear Weapons Policy

-Life Extension Programs

-Plutonium "Triggers" for Nuclear Bombs


DC Days 2007

-DOE "Accelerated Cleanup":  Doesn't Meet Legal Requirements, Fails to Save Time and Money

-Complex 2030:  Undermines Security, Threatens Environment


-Global Nuclear Eneergy Partnership:  Environmental  and Security Risks


-Wanted:  Justice for Nuclear Testing Victims

-U.S. Plutonium Plans:  Weapons, Waste and Proliferation

-Nuclear Weapons Forever:  The Reliable Replacement Warhead Program

-Yucca Mountain Project:  Not the Solution to Nuclear Weapons


© 2010 Alliance for Nuclear Accountability   |  Citadel Hosting  |  Terms Of Use  |  Privacy Statement