 |
Categories |
|
 |
| | | |
| | |
|
|
|
| | | published Friday, February 15, 2008 | 862 Views | FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Concerned Citizens of Wisconsin Hold Public Hearing on U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy and Future of Nuclear Arsenal
Madison, Wisconsin (February 16, 2008)--On Saturday, February 16th at 10:00am, at the State Capitol building in Madison, Wisconsin, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation will be co-sponsoring a hearing on U.S. nuclear weapons policy and the Department of Energy’s (DOE) proposed nuclear weapons complex transformation.
|
| read more.. |
|
| | | published Tuesday, February 12, 2008 | 986 Views |
This
is a historic time for the public to speak out about nuclear weapons.
The U.S. government has proposed a plan called Complex Transformation,
which would refurbish the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Complex, the eight sites
around the country that produce and maintain our nuclear weapons.
You
can comment on these plans and what they mean during the Public Comment
Period, which is open now and closes on APRIL 10, 2008.
Please comment
- every voice counts!
|
| read more.. |
|
| | | published Friday, February 08, 2008 | 861 Views | For many Americans, nuclear weapons bring up old memories and forgotten
associations -- the duck and cover drills of the 1950s, President
Reagan's exhortations against the "evil empire," and the plot lines of
countless straight-to-video political thrillers. It may then come as a
surprise that in 2008 the United States is considering a huge new
investment in nuclear weapons.
|
| read more.. |
|
| | | published Thursday, January 31, 2008 | 935 Views | For immediate release Thursday January 31, 2008 Susan Gordon, Director, Alliance for Nuclear Accountability (505) 473-1670
WHAT TO LOOK FOR IN THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FY 2009 BUDGET REQUEST
The Department of Energy (DOE) FY 2009 budget request will be released on Monday, February 4, 2008. The Alliance for Nuclear Accountability (ANA), a national network representing communities downwind and downstream from U.S. nuclear weapons facilities, is concerned that spending on nuclear weapons and power will divert funds away from environmental cleanup, weapons dismantlement, and plutonium disposition.
ANA is concerned about the following likely FY 2009 budget proposals.
|
| read more.. |
|
| | | published Monday, October 15, 2007 | 2313 Views |
On Friday, October 19, the Alliance for Nuclear Accountability, a
network of national and grassroots organizations whose members live
downwind and downstream from the major U.S. nuclear weapons facilities,
will host a public forum detailing the central role of the Kansas City
Plant in the U.S. nuclear weapons complex.
|
| read more.. |
|
| | | published Thursday, October 04, 2007 | 2144 Views |
NUCLEAR EXPERTS AND ACTIVISTS FROM ACROSS
THE NATION CONVENING IN KANSAS CITY:
Key Facility in U.S. Nuclear Weapons Complex within City Limits
In the third week of October, the Alliance for
Nuclear Accountability (ANA), a network of national and grassroots
organizations whose members live downwind and downstream of the major
U.S. nuclear weapons facilities, will be meeting in Kansas City to
raise awareness about the importance of the Department of Energy’s
Kansas City Plant in the production of new nuclear weapons.
|
| read more.. |
|
| | | published Friday, September 21, 2007 | 1235 Views |
ANA staff and colleagues have prepared these scoping comments on the Department of Energy's plans to dispose of Greater-Than-Class-C radioactive waste. The comment period closed on September 21, 2007; we await the DOE response to these and other comments in the form of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement.
PAST AND PRESENT • What is the history of disposal of GTCC and GTCC-like waste? Where was such waste generated and what were its characteristics? How and where was it disposed of in the past?
• How much total GTCC and GTCC-like waste is there currently? Is there any of this kind of waste that is not listed in the NOI? Please provide the total amount of GTCC and GTCC-like waste by state and by site, by radioactivity and volume.
|
| read more.. |
|
| | | published Thursday, May 31, 2007 | 1010 Views |
program would expand global nuclear energy
production by creating plutonium fuel to be used in a new generation of nuclear
power plants through the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel. Reprocessing of
spent nuclear fuel – extracting the plutonium and uranium from used fuel – is
the dirtiest operation of the nuclear fuel cycle and produces separated
plutonium and other nuclear weapon-usable materials and vast amounts of
extremely dangerous waste.
GNEP is incredibly expensive. Government
estimates place the cost between $3 billion and $6 billion in its first five
years. However, the Department of Energy (DOE) has provided no costs for
operation and eventual decontamination. An estimate by the National Academies of
Science states that reprocessing the spent fuel now targeted for Yucca Mountain
would cost between $50 billion to $100 billion more than direct disposal (1996
dollars).
Despite the claims of proponents,
reprocessing is not “recycling” and will not help the nation’s waste problem—it
will only spread the radioactive waste over a greater volume of waste streams.
The waste from reprocessing is hotter than the original spent fuel and will
still require storage in a geologic repository.
For a short period in the 1960s and 1970s, the U.S. government reprocessed
spent nuclear fuel for use in commercial reactors until the practice was banned
in 1976. Even though the ban on reprocessing was lifted in 1981, industry showed
no interest due to its exorbitant costs and the availability of inexpensive
uranium ore. Reprocessing for nuclear weapons other military programs took place
in Washington State, South Carolina, and Idaho from the 1940s through the 1980s.
These sites remain some of the most polluted places in the Western Hemisphere.
The legacy of reprocessing is 100 million gallons of extremely dangerous
high-level radioactive waste, stored in 243 leak-prone tanks and threatening
crucial water resources.
|  |
| | |
|
|
| | | published Thursday, May 31, 2007 | 3730 Views | The National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) mandates that the public be allowed the opportunity to provide scoping comments on the federal government's Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement process.
ANA has submitted their comments on the Department of Energy's Global Nuclear Energy Partnership plan which threatens to revive the practice of "reprocessing" spent nuclear fuel. Reprocessing is the technology which created the horrible environmental contamination at Hanford, WA, Savannah River Site, SC, West Valley, NY, and the Idaho National Laboratory.
|
| read more.. |
|
| | | published Wednesday, May 23, 2007 | 6301 Views | May 23, 2007
 The House Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee approved their spending bill for FY 2008, cutting all funds for the Reliable Replacement Warhead program, reducing spending on nuclear reprocessing and plutonium reactor fuel programs, while restoring money for badly needed environmental cleanup of Department of Energy sites.
|
| read more.. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Fact Sheets 2008 |
|
 |
| | | |
 |
Fact Sheets for 2007 |
|
 |
| | | |
|