17 May 2012 Register   Login
Nuclear Weapons
Complex "Modernization"
After our member groups and allies successfully beat back Department of Energy expansion efforts under the banner of “Complex Transformation”, the laboratory directors are back with their revamped plans for “Complex Modernization”.

As part of the negotiations to ratify New Start in late 2010, President Obama promised $85 billion for “Complex Modernization”.

What is all of this money going to get us?

Fiscal Year 2011 Performance Evaluation Reports
April 12, 2012

In response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed by ANA member group Nuclear Watch New Mexico on March 28, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) has released the Performance Evaluation Reports for its eight nuclear weapons sites. These reports are the government's scorecard for awarding tens of millions of dollars to nuclear weapons contractors, and were available to the public until 2009. But since that time NNSA has withheld them in a general move toward less contractor accountability.


Click the links below to download the Performance Evaluation Reports for each nuclear weapons site (PDFs)
Print  

Nuclear Weapons Sites

View Department of Energy Nuclear Complex Sites in a larger map
This map shows Department of Energy nuclear sites. These sites include active National Nuclear securfity Administration sites, Environmental Management cleanup sites and Legacy Management sites
Print  

Budget Bill Cuts Spending for Lab
published Monday, December 19, 2011  918 Views

December 17, 2011

From the Associated Press

The compromise budget bill approved by the U.S. House on Friday slashes funding for and prohibits any site preparation work on a controversial new $6 billion nuclear facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory.

The spending bill appropriates $200 million for the project this fiscal year, $100 million less than the administration had requested. It also notes that “no construction activities are funded for the project this year,” and calls for a new report on the country’s capability for manufacturing “pits,” or the cores that power nuclear weapons.

Watchdogs hailed the budget action as a sign Congress was backing its calls for the National Nuclear Security Administration to slow down on plans to build the facility.

“We are very pleased that Congress has substantially agreed with our analysis regarding the need to delay this project, and has also endorsed our call to re-examine alternatives for managing pit production,” Greg Mello, head of the Los Alamos Study Group, said in a statement. His group has filed two lawsuits seeking to force NNSA to study alternatives to the Chemistry Metallurgy Research Replacement Facility, or CMRR.

Lab officials say the CMRR, a proposed new lab, is needed to replace a 1940s-era facility that is beyond renovation yet crucial to supporting its mission as the primary center for maintaining and developing the country’s nuclear weapons.

Although the facility has been in the planning stages for years, increased scrutiny has been placed on the lab in recent years as its price has shot up in response to what has been discovered to be a greater potential for a major earthquake along the fault lines that run under LANL.

Mello said the budget bill indicates “Congress is in no mood to pursue a risky ‘design-build’ process for a multibillion-dollar, one-of-a-kind plutonium facility in a high-seismicity location.”

“That idea was nuts, and thankfully Congress appears to see that,” he said.




Our Weapons Experts
Print  

 



© 2012 Alliance for Nuclear Accountability   |  Citadel Hosting  |  Terms Of Use  |  Privacy Statement