 |
Announcements |
|
 |
|
 |
| GNEP Public Hearings - Thursday, February 08, 2007Public Hearings are scheduled February 13-March 19, 2007 at sites for the public to provide comments, raise issues and concerns regarding the the Bush Administration's Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) program. read more ...
|
| | DOE Announces 11 Sites for GNEP Siting Studies - Tuesday, January 30, 2007The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced on January 30, 2007 that over $10 million will be used for 11 commercial and public consortia selected to conduct detailed siting studies for integrated spent fuel recycling facilities under President Bush’s Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP). read more ...
|
| | ANA Warns of GNEP's Environmental and Proliferation Dangers - Tuesday, October 31, 2006 On October 31, 2006, Alliance for Nuclear Accountability (ANA) sent out a media advisory opposing DOE’s plans to bring the nation’s spent nuclear fuel to any site and to build a full-scale commercial reprocessing plant and fast burner reactor. “GNEP would be a financial, environmental, and nuclear proliferation disaster,” says Susan Gordon, Director of ANA. To access the ANA Press Release, click here: ANA GNEP Press Release.doc
|
|
|
 |
| | |
| | |
|
|
| | | published Monday, April 23, 2007 | 6618 Views :: 0 Comments | |  |
Alliance for Nuclear Accountability A national
network of organizations working to address issues of nuclear weapons
production and waste cleanup
for further information, contact Bob Schaeffer (239) 395-6773
April 22 – 25, 2007 (202) 544-0217
for use after 10am, Monday, April 23, 2007, Rayburn House Office Bldg. 2322 News Conference
“RADIOACTIVE REPORT CARD” FLUNKS U.S. NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROGRAMS; ALLIANCE FOR NUCLEAR ACCOUNTABILITY SEEKS NEW BUDGET PRIORITIES; EXPERT REPORT BLASTS GLOBAL NUCLEAR ENERGY PARTNERSHIP AS “COSTLY RADIOACTIVE WASTE SHELL GAME”
Leaders
of groups representing communities downwind and downstream from U.S.
nuclear weapons facilities today issued a “Radioactive Report Card”
assigning low grades to the Bush Administration’s Department of Energy
(DOE) bomb production and cleanup programs.
The Alliance for
Nuclear Accountability (ANA) gave DOE an “F” in “Budget Priorities” and
a “D” for “Environmental Compliance.” ANA did, however, award DOE a B+
for “Public Relations Rhetoric” commenting that “High-sounding promises
about health, safety, environment and national security are not being
fulfilled.”
Each ANA grade came with a recommendation for
“improvement needed” by DOE, such as “Tell the truth. Obey the law.
Deal honestly and openly with the public.” “DOE is pursuing a ‘new
weapons at any cost’ policy which keeps production spending higher than
the Cold War average,” charged Jay Coghlan, director of Nuclear Watch
of New Mexico. “Misleading schemes, such as the so-called Reliable
Replacement Warhead program and Complex 2030, will leave the nation’s
nuclear arsenal less reliable and the public less safe. That’s why we
gave DOE an ‘A’ for unnecessary weapons production.”
Beatrice
Brailsford, program director of Idaho’s Snake River Alliance, added,
“DOE’s desire to do cleanup on the cheap jeopardizes binding clean-up
agreements and threatens crucial water supplies such as the Columbia,
Savannah, and Ohio rivers and the Snake River Aquifer. Politics, not
science, has driven decisions to keep untreated highly radioactive
wastes in leaking storage tanks.” The ANA report card gave DOE a C- for
“Waste Cleanup,” noting “inadequate funding and poor project
management,” and an “Incomplete” for the unproven, long-term monitoring
work of its Office of Legacy Management.
“DOE has targeted the
southeastern U.S. for its version of a nuclear weapons theme park,”
explained Bobbie Paul, director of Atlanta Women’s Action for New
Directions. “Proposals such as the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership
(GNEP) and plutonium reactor fuel increase the risk of radioactive
contamination in the region. At the same time, DOE is not seeking
adequate funds for environmental programs at the Savannah River Site.”
John
Hadder, president of Healing Ourselves and Mother Earth (H.O.M.E) in
Reno, Nevada, said DOE deserved a grade of “D” for its attempted
“Nuclear Power Revival.” Hadder noted, “Falsified scientific data is
just the latest chapter in the troubled saga of the Yucca Mountain
nuclear waste dump. DOE should cancel Yucca Mountain and develop a
scientifically sound, socially responsible policy for managing
radioactive wastes.”
Robert Alvarez, a former senior DOE
policy advisor, joined the ANA leaders to release a new report
analyzing the GNEP program. “GNEP is a costly radioactive waste shell
game,” Alvarez said. “The program is likely to squander billions in
taxpayer dollars on an unproven technology that will generate
unprecedented amounts of contaminated materials without plausible paths
to manage them.” The study is titled, “Radioactive Wastes and the
Global Nuclear Energy Partnership.”
During the coming week,
more than 80 ANA activists from across the country have scheduled
scores of meetings with members of Congress, their staffs and
Administration officials. On Tuesday evening, April 24, ANA will
celebrate 20 years of grassroots organizing at an awards ceremony
recognizing leaders in the effort to stop unnecessary nuclear weapons
production and radioactive contamination. Honorees include U.S. Senator
Jeff Bingaman, Russian activist Andrey Talevlin, Rocky Flats organizer
Adrienne Anderson, and whistleblower Robert Gilkeson. The event will
take place in Room G-11 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
- - 3 0 - -
- The Alliance for Nuclear Accountability 2007 “Radioactive Report Card” is attached
- Copies of a detailed “Radioactive Report Card Grade Book,” the report on GNEP by Robert Alvarez, and an ANA briefing kit on current nuclear weapons issues are available on request |
| Comments | Currently, there are no comments. Be the first to post one!
Click here to post a comment |
|
|
|
|
 |
Resources |
|
 |
| | | |
|