3 September 2010    Login
Library

ANA in the News
Rocky Flats Site

published Tuesday, August 10, 2010  388 Views :: 0 Comments

AOL News
(Aug. 4) -- Activists questioning the thoroughness of the cleanup at an old nuclear weapons plant northwest of Denver say they have found particles of weapons-grade plutonium in air samples taken near the site. Part of the site is a national wildlife refuge that is slated to open for public recreation.

The federal Department of Energy declared in 2005 that its decontamination of the Rocky Flats facility was complete, after a 10-year effort that cost $7 billion (although the DOE originally thought the project would take 65 years and $37 billion). The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is planning to allow public recreation at a national wildlife refuge established in 2007 on part of the site.

read more..

published Saturday, October 24, 2009  1511 Views :: 1 Comments

PLUTONIUM AND PEOPLE DON’T MIX
WHY THE ROCKY FLATS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
SHOULD REMAIN CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC
by LeRoy Moore, PhD, Rocky Mountain Peace & Justice Center, October 13, 2009

Soon after completion in 2005 of the “cleanup” of the site of the defunct Rocky Flats nuclear bomb plant near Denver, the Department of Energy (DOE) transferred about three-fourths of the nearly 10 square mile Rocky Flats site to the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to operate as a wildlife refuge. FWS had already decided to open the future refuge for public recreation. This paper elaborates three reasons why this decision should be reversed:

• The site is contaminated with an unknown quantity of plutonium and americium.
• Standards for permissible exposure to plutonium and americium adopted for the site provide inadequate protection for potential visitors to the refuge because the standards are based on a flawed method of risk assessment and a truncated view of the toxicity of these materials.
• In addition, those responsible for the Rocky Flats “cleanup” did not consider some crucial data regarding environmental conditions at the site.
• Together, these points add up to a great weight of uncertainty that underscores the need for caution. The conclusion to this paper looks at alternatives for dealing with the refuge, including a visionary approach for nuclear guardianship.


To read full paper, click here

read more..

published Thursday, August 06, 2009  2074 Views :: 12 Comments

By Nickolas Roth, Program Director, Alliance for Nuclear Accountability
August 6th, 2009

The anniversary of the United States atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki serve as a reminder of the danger posed by nuclear weapons and the need for this country to work in good faith toward their elimination. The bombings killed more than 200,000 people and set in motion an arms race that has resulted in several near brushes with nuclear war.

There are more than 20,000 nuclear weapons in existence today. The vast majority of these weapons are held by the United States and Russia, with 9,400 and 13,000 respectively.

Originally published in the Los Alamos Monitor:
http://www.lcni5.com/cgi-bin/c2.cgi?075+article+Opinion+20090806145909075075001

read more..

published Monday, February 23, 2009  562 Views :: 0 Comments

Life Extension Program

In the late-1980’s the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Rocky Flats Plant, which produced plutonium pits for nuclear warheads, was shut down after a raid by the FBI. Eventually, the plant was shuttered, disrupting the U.S. capacity for producing new warheads.

Download 2009 Fact Sheet:  LEP2 final.pdf


published Monday, February 23, 2009  482 Views :: 0 Comments

Six decades of U.S. nuclear weapons research, testing, and production activities have left dozens of Department of Energy (DOE) sites polluted with massive amounts of radioactive and hazardous wastes. Most DOE sites are now on the Superfund list of the nation’s most environmentally dangerous facilities. Their contamination threatens millions of people living near the sites or along major waste transportation routes. Some of the nation’s most important water resources are endangered.

Download 2009 Fact Sheet:  Cleanup5.1 final.pdf


published Monday, October 20, 2008  289 Views :: 0 Comments

The following is a geographic list of Grassroots Organizations who monitor Nuclear sites in the United States.

Download PDF:  GRASSROOT GROUPS MONITORING NUCLEAR SITES.pdf


 

DC Days 2010


The US Nuclear Weapons Complex


Concrete Treaty-Based Steps to Reduce the Nuclear Threat


Cleaning Up the Nuclear Legacy


No Nuclear Power Bailout


Reprocessing and Plutonium - Not the Basis for Clean Energy


DC Days 2009


-Complex Transformation Wrong Policy, Wrong Priority, Wrong Direction


-Halting Unnecessary Nuclear Weapons Production


-Towards a Nuclear Weapons Free World


-Reprocessing and Plutonium Fuel Are Not Clean Energy


-Cleaning up the Nuclear Weapons Legacy


-Protecting the Environment from Nuclear Waste and Power

 

-Plutonium "Triggers" for Nuclear Bombs

 

-Permanently Ending Nuclear Testing

 

-Plutonium Disposition Remains in Disarray

 

-Radiation Standards



DC Days 2008

-Environmental Cleanup of the Nuclear Weapons Complex

-Spent Fuel Reprocessing and the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership

-Proposed Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository

-Plutonium Disposition: Vitrification vs. MOX Reactor Fuel

-The Reliable Replacement Warhead Program and "Complex Transformation"

-Nuclear Weapons Policy

-Life Extension Programs

-Plutonium "Triggers" for Nuclear Bombs


DC Days 2007

-DOE "Accelerated Cleanup":  Doesn't Meet Legal Requirements, Fails to Save Time and Money

-Complex 2030:  Undermines Security, Threatens Environment


-Global Nuclear Eneergy Partnership:  Environmental  and Security Risks


-Wanted:  Justice for Nuclear Testing Victims

-U.S. Plutonium Plans:  Weapons, Waste and Proliferation

-Nuclear Weapons Forever:  The Reliable Replacement Warhead Program

-Yucca Mountain Project:  Not the Solution to Nuclear Weapons


© 2010 Alliance for Nuclear Accountability   |  Citadel Hosting  |  Terms Of Use  |  Privacy Statement