4 February 2012 Register   Login
Library

ANA in the News
Nuclear Waste

published Friday, February 03, 2012  13 Views :: 0 Comments

Tell the Department of Energy not to put nuclear bombs in power plants!

Jan. 3, 2012 

The Department of Energy (DOE) is currently accepting public comments on the scope of their upcoming Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) regarding disposing of surplus plutonium. The DOE has already held it's only public hearing for this SPEIS, but you can still make a comment until March 12th, 2012. Read the comment that ANA submitted at this hearing here.

Submit your own comment!

Read ANA's comment and learn more about the SEIS process on the DOE's website.


read more..

published Thursday, February 02, 2012  45 Views :: 0 Comments

for immediate release: Thursday, January 26, 2012

for further information, contact:
Bob Schaeffer: 239-395-6773
Katherine Fuchs: 202-544-0217, ext. 2503
local contacts listed at end of advisory

The Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future report released today received mixed reviews from groups that monitor sites where large quantities of radioactive waste are stored. The Alliance for Nuclear Accountability (ANA) said major flaws in the report include the Commission’s “failure to advocate prompt removal of commercial spent fuel from reactor cooling pools with placement in hardened On-Site Storage (HOSS) to safeguard commercial spent fuel at nuclear power plants.” ANA and hundreds of community groups had told the Commission that HOSS could protect the heavily reactive material for the decades needed to develop a scientifically sound and publicly acceptable waste disposal program.

read more..

published Wednesday, February 01, 2012  31 Views :: 0 Comments

The following piece contains a quote from Don Hancock, longtime ANA members and Director of the Southwest Research & Information Center's Nuclear Waste program. Don has been watchdogging nuclear waste "disposal" at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in New Mexico from the beginning of the disposal program.

Feb. 1, 2012


By John Fleck
From the Albuquerque Journal

The New Mexico Environment Department on Tuesday rejected a federal proposal to begin mixing highly radioactive waste among the low-dose waste that makes up the bulk of the material at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad.

But the decision leaves the door open for the issue to be reconsidered.

read more..

published Tuesday, January 31, 2012  65 Views :: 0 Comments

For immediate releaseJanuary 27, 2012 

For further information, contact:
Dr. Arjun Makhijani  (301) 270-5500, cell  (301) 509-6843

Commission Recognizes French Style Reprocessing Will Increase Proliferation Risks Without Solving Waste Problem

Progress on Consent-Based Approach to Geologic Repository Siting
 
Takoma Park, Maryland -- Arjun Makhijani, Ph.D., President of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, today commented on some of the recommendations of the final report of the Presidential Blue Ribbon Commission (BRC) on America’s Nuclear Future, released yesterday. The commission was created to address U.S. nuclear waste issues after the Obama administration cancelled the Yucca Mountain program.

read more..

published Tuesday, January 31, 2012  42 Views :: 0 Comments

31 JANUARY 2012 

By: Seth P. Tuler, Eugene A. Rosa, and Thomas Webler
From the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

Article Highlights:
  • The Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future endeavored to engage experts and the general public in developing policies for managing spent nuclear fuel and high-level waste.
  • Despite an expressed desire to serve as a model of participatory processes, the Commission provided limited opportunities for public input, influence, and involvement.
  • To be successful, future decision-making processes for managing spent nuclear fuel and high-level waste will need to be even more transparent, inclusive, and respectful of public participation.

read more..

published Monday, January 23, 2012  182 Views :: 0 Comments

The following feature explores problems at the Washington State nuclear Waste Treatment Plant and quotes ANA member Tom Carpenter. ANA has been tracking progress at the Waste Treatment Plant or decades and recognized whistleblower Walt 
Tamosaitis at our 2011 DC Days awards reception.

January 17, 2012

By H. Darr Beiser
From the USA TODAY

HANFORD SITE, Wash. – Seven decades after scientists came here during World War II to create plutonium for the first atomic bomb, a new generation is struggling with an even more daunting task: cleaning up the radioactive mess.

The U.S. government is building a treatment plant to stabilize and contain 56 million gallons of waste left from a half-century of nuclear weapons production. The radioactive sludge is so dangerous that a few hours of exposure could be fatal. A major leak could contaminate water supplies serving millions across the Northwest. The cleanup is the most complex and costly environmental restoration ever attempted.

And the project is not going well.

read more..

published Thursday, January 12, 2012  249 Views :: 0 Comments

The following article quotes ANA Director Susan Gordon as she analyses cleanup agreements made between Los Alamos National Laboratory and the State of New Mexico.

LANL’s new cleanup agreement: a bold step in the wrong direction?

Jan. 11, 2012

By Wren Abbott
From the Santa Fe Reporter

A new agreement between the state Environment Department and Los Alamos National Laboratory would accelerate shipments of radioactive waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in Carlsbad (pictured)—but would also leave more than half the waste on the hill indefinitely.

Los Alamos National Laboratory is trumpeting a new radioactive waste cleanup agreement that would allow it to leave half of its radioactive waste in place indefinitely—and defy federal environmental protection guidelines.

read more..

published Monday, January 09, 2012  345 Views :: 0 Comments

The following article on Los Alamos National Laboratory's ever-changing cleanup schedule quotes ANA Director Susan Gordon and ANA member Scott Kovac giving their perspectives on Los Alamos' remediation plans.

January 6, 2012

By Mark Oswald and John Fleck
From the Albuquerque Journal

POJOAQUE — Los Alamos National Laboratory on Thursday committed to moving the equivalent of 17,000 drums of radioactive waste that have been stored above ground for decades off lab property by 2014.

But lab officials also said they can’t meet their commitment to clean up other lab hazardous waste by 2015.

Moving the waste drums — which caused consternation and gained international press attention during last summer’s Las Conchas Fire as flames headed toward Los Alamos — is a top state priority.

But the longer-term cleanup goal, established in a 2005 agreement known as a “consent order,” has been suspect for some time because of a shortfall in federal money for lab cleanup work.

read more..

published Monday, December 12, 2011  815 Views :: 0 Comments

The following article discusses the Hanford, WA nuclear waste treatment plant that ANA has long been concerned about. The article examines retaliation against Walt Tamosaitis, a whistleblower who ANA recognized at our 2011 DC Days awards reception. The piece also quotes ANA member, Tom Carpenter, a long-time Hanford watchdog.

December 11, 2011

By Shannon Dininny
From the Associated Press

The federal government says a one-of-a-kind plant that will convert radioactive waste into a stable and storable substance that resembles glass will cost hundreds of millions of dollars more and may take longer to build, adding to a string of delays and skyrocketing price tag for the project.

In addition, several workers at southeast Washington's Hanford nuclear reservation have raised concerns about the safety of the plant's design — and complained they've been retaliated against for voicing their issues.

The turmoil has some in the Pacific Northwest uneasy about the plant's long-term viability and fearful that a frustrated Congress could balk at paying more money for a project long considered the cornerstone of cleanup at the highly contaminated site.


read more..

published Monday, December 05, 2011  976 Views :: 0 Comments

December 1, 2011

PRESS STATEMENT

Contact:Tom Carpenter, 206-419-5829, tomc@hanfordchallenge.org

Seattle, WA:  Hanford Challenge today sharply criticized a report from a team of contractorselected experts that it says downplayed the seriousness of safety culture problems at the Hanford nuclear site.  

“The report is a veiled attack on safety-culture oversight.  It failed to acknowledge some of the most explicit indicators of the vit plant’s flawed safety culture.  There was no mention of disclosures from three important safety experts on the Waste Treatment Plant who have gone public and filed concerns about suppression of technical and safety issues and putting schedule and cost before safety,” said Tom Carpenter, Executive Director of Hanford Challenge. Carpenter noted that this includes the Manager of Nuclear and Environmental Safety, DOE’s top scientist on the project, and the former Manager for Research and Technology. 

read more..

  
Article List page 1 of 13
Next Page  


 



© 2012 Alliance for Nuclear Accountability   |  Citadel Hosting  |  Terms Of Use  |  Privacy Statement