10 February 2012 Register   Login
Library

ANA in the News
Reprocessing

published Wednesday, March 30, 2011  2847 Views :: 0 Comments

For Immediate Release: March 30, 2011

For further information contact:
Bob Schaeffer (239) 395-6773 / (239) 699-0468

WHAT: News briefing to release Nuclear Reality Check$: The U.S. Department of Energy’s Most Dangerous, Budget Busting Proposals, a new report analyzing reactor subsidy, weapons production and clean-up projects characterized by major environmental and safety dangers as well as mammoth cost overruns.

WHEN: Monday, April 4, 2011 - - 9:30am

WHERE: National Press Club – Zenger Room, 529 14th St. N.W., Washington, DC

WHO: Leaders of the Alliance for Nuclear Accountability (ANA) a national network of organizations representing the concerns of people living downwind and downstream from U.S. nuclear research, testing, production and waste disposal facilities

read more..

published Thursday, February 17, 2011  1853 Views :: 0 Comments

February 16, 2011

By Ed Lyman
From the Union of Concerned Scientists Blog, All Things Nuclear

Republican leaders in the House of Representatives have turned their budget ax to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) program for nuclear nonproliferation activities, proposing a cut of $602 million below the Obama administration’s fiscal year 2011 (FY 2011) budget request. Many observers in the security community have been rightly incensed about these proposed cuts, which would squeeze vital nonproliferation and counter-terrorism programs that provide direct and near-term benefits for American security, including the Global Threat Reduction Initiative, which works to secure nuclear materials around the world.

However, there is one project within the NNSA’s nonproliferation budget account that does nothing to reduce security threats for the foreseeable future. It is also the single most costly program in the account, receiving over $666 million (over 30% of the total) in FY 2010. Moreover, even if it is completed, it will likely fail to achieve its primary objectives in a reasonable time and at reasonable cost. Worst yet, the project could well increase the risk that plutonium will end up in the hands of terrorists. For this reason, this program should never have been funded out of NNSA’s nonproliferation account in the first place.

The name of this project? The U.S. Plutonium Disposition Program.

read more..

published Friday, February 04, 2011  3187 Views :: 0 Comments

We are pleased to announce that the classic Facing Reality series of guides for grassroots advocates seeking to understand and engage our nation's nuclear weapons complex is now available online!

This series of guides grew out of an April 1991 meeting of members of the Military Production Network (now known as the Alliance for Nuclear Accountability (ANA)), other groups concerned with nuclear weapons issues, and a wide variety of funders, hosted by the Tides and W. Alton Jones Foundations, the Rockefeller Family Fund and the North Shore Unitarian Universalist Society/Veatch Program.

read more..

published Friday, February 12, 2010  2922 Views :: 2 Comments

Op-Ed from Dan Yoken


On February 4, 2010, Secretary of Energy Chu testified before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee to discuss the President’s FY2011 budget request. While we agree with many of Chu’s commitments to clean energy and environmental cleanup, the focus on nuclear energy projects, the imbalance of the Nuclear Waste Panel and the hefty commitment to MOX in the Nonproliferation budget present problems that could lead to debilitating results in coming years.


read more..

published Wednesday, January 27, 2010  7426 Views :: 8 Comments

Alliance for Nuclear Accountability a national network of organizations working to address issues of nuclear weapons production and waste cleanup
http://www.ananuclear.org

for further information, contact:
Nickolas Roth 914-673-6666
Susan Gordon 505-577-8438
or local contacts listed at end of advisory

for immediate release Wednesday, January 27, 2010
WHAT TO LOOK FOR IN THE U.S. DEPT. OF ENERGY FY 2011
NUCLEAR WEAPONS BUDGET REQUEST


The FY 2011 budget request will be released on Monday, February 1, 2010. The Obama administration has laid out an aggressive nonproliferation agenda that includes deep reductions in nuclear stockpiles, ratification of a nuclear test ban, and decreased prominence for nuclear weapons in US defense policy. Despite this agenda, the Department of Energy’s (DOE) budget request will ask Congress to significantly increase nuclear weapons activities, including funding for construction of new facilities that will expand U.S. warhead production capacity. The DOE request will not reflect recent independent scientific conclusions that existing nuclear weapons can be reliably maintained for decades under current, well-established programs.

The Alliance for Nuclear Accountability (ANA), a national network representing communities downwind and downstream from U.S. nuclear weapons facilities, is concerned that increased funding for nuclear energy and weapons research and production will rob precious resources for needed environmental cleanup and clean, sustainable energy solutions.

Items of interest:

read more..

published Monday, September 14, 2009  2626 Views :: 3 Comments

Monday, Sep. 14, 2009

By Annette Cary, Tri-City Herald staff writer

Making Hanford the nation's storage site for tons of excess mercury
could interfere with environmental cleanup of the site, according to
government agencies.

The states of Washington and Oregon, the Hanford Communities and the
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation each have
submitted written comments to the Department of Energy outlining their
concerns.

"It is unacceptable for the nation's leadership to consider sending
12,000 tons of elemental mercury to Hanford when it will be another 50
years before existing waste is cleaned up," the tribes said in a letter
to DOE.

DOE is looking across the nation for mercury storage sites after the
Mercury Export Ban Act of 2008 prohibited the export of mercury
beginning in 2013 and required the agency to have facilities ready to
manage and store mercury generated in the United States.

read more..

published Tuesday, August 11, 2009  5691 Views :: 26 Comments

August 11, 2009

By ROGER SNODGRASS, Monitor Editor

There are currently several nails in the coffin of a nuclear policy that has
strongly favored commercial reprocessing and recycling of plutonium. Ivan
Oelrich wants to make sure it doesn’t pop open again.

A recurring idea in the political tug-of-war between proponents and
opponents of nuclear energy, nuclear reprocessing is intended to achieving a
plutonium fuel cycle, and thereby provide a plentiful supply of nuclear fuel
and a more easily-stored waste product.

Originally published  in the Los Alamos Monitor: http://www.lcni5.com/cgi-bin/c2.cgi?075+article+News+20090808213804075075001

read more..

published Monday, August 10, 2009  2911 Views :: 3 Comments

Japan Times, Monday, Aug. 10, 2009

By DAVID JEFFRIES
Kyodo News

HANFORD, Wash. (Kyodo) For Shirley Olinger, managing the cleanup of the Hanford nuclear site —part of the Hanford nuclear site in Washington state that produced the plutonium for the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki in 1945 — is personal.

Despite these signs of progress, Tom Carpenter, executive director of the Hanford Challenge, warns that the bulk of the work has yet to be done.
"I call this 'stopping the bleeding' because it was damaging the environment," Carpenter said. "But what can we really say about tank waste? Ninety percent of the Hanford cleanup is this waste. And I think they are stuck."

Originally published in the Japan Times: http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20090810a8.html


read more..

published Monday, December 08, 2008  11200 Views :: 21 Comments


WASHINGTON, DC – The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a notification in the Federal Register today that it is extending the comment period on the Draft Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) by 90 days. The public comment period will now end on March 16, 2009.

read more..

published Monday, December 08, 2008  8067 Views :: 10 Comments

Audio transcripts of GNEP hearing in Bolingbrook, Illinois provided by IndyMedia reporter and Greens candidate Rita Sand Maniotis

http://chicago.indymedia.org/media/all/display/31025/index.php

http://chicago.indymedia.org/media/all/display/31026/index.php

http://chicago.indymedia.org/media/all/display/31027/index.php

read more..

  Previous Page
Article List page 2 of 4
Next Page  


 



© 2012 Alliance for Nuclear Accountability   |  Citadel Hosting  |  Terms Of Use  |  Privacy Statement