 |
|
|
| | | published Wednesday, March 30, 2011 | 2847 Views :: 0 Comments | For Immediate Release: March 30, 2011
For further information contact: Bob Schaeffer (239) 395-6773 / (239) 699-0468
WHAT: News briefing to release Nuclear Reality
Check$: The U.S. Department of Energy’s Most Dangerous, Budget Busting
Proposals, a new report analyzing reactor subsidy, weapons production
and clean-up projects characterized by major environmental and safety
dangers as well as mammoth cost overruns.
WHEN: Monday, April 4, 2011 - - 9:30am
WHERE: National Press Club – Zenger Room, 529 14th St. N.W., Washington, DC
WHO: Leaders of the Alliance for Nuclear Accountability (ANA) a
national network of organizations representing the concerns of people
living downwind and downstream from U.S. nuclear research, testing,
production and waste disposal facilities
|
| read more.. |
|
| | | published Thursday, February 17, 2011 | 1853 Views :: 0 Comments | February 16, 2011
By Ed Lyman
From the Union of Concerned Scientists Blog, All Things Nuclear
Republican leaders in the House of Representatives have turned their budget ax to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) program for nuclear nonproliferation activities, proposing a cut of $602 million below the Obama administration’s fiscal year 2011 (FY 2011) budget request. Many observers in the security community have been rightly incensed about these proposed cuts, which would squeeze vital nonproliferation and counter-terrorism programs that provide direct and near-term benefits for American security, including the Global Threat Reduction Initiative, which works to secure nuclear materials around the world.
However, there is one project within the NNSA’s nonproliferation budget account that does nothing to reduce security threats for the foreseeable future. It is also the single most costly program in the account, receiving over $666 million (over 30% of the total) in FY 2010. Moreover, even if it is completed, it will likely fail to achieve its primary objectives in a reasonable time and at reasonable cost. Worst yet, the project could well increase the risk that plutonium will end up in the hands of terrorists. For this reason, this program should never have been funded out of NNSA’s nonproliferation account in the first place.
The name of this project? The U.S. Plutonium Disposition Program.
|
| read more.. |
|
| | | published Friday, February 04, 2011 | 3187 Views :: 0 Comments | We are pleased to announce that the classic Facing Reality series of guides for grassroots advocates seeking to understand and engage our nation's nuclear weapons complex is now available online!
This series of guides grew out of an April 1991 meeting of members of the Military Production Network (now known as the Alliance for Nuclear Accountability (ANA)),
other groups concerned with nuclear weapons issues, and a wide variety
of funders, hosted by the Tides and W. Alton Jones Foundations, the
Rockefeller Family Fund and the North Shore Unitarian Universalist
Society/Veatch Program.
|
| read more.. |
|
| | | published Friday, February 12, 2010 | 2922 Views :: 2 Comments | Op-Ed from Dan Yoken
On February 4, 2010, Secretary of Energy Chu testified before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee to discuss the President’s FY2011 budget request. While we agree with many of Chu’s commitments to clean energy and environmental cleanup, the focus on nuclear energy projects, the imbalance of the Nuclear Waste Panel and the hefty commitment to MOX in the Nonproliferation budget present problems that could lead to debilitating results in coming years.
|
| read more.. |
|
| | | published Wednesday, January 27, 2010 | 7426 Views :: 8 Comments |
Alliance for Nuclear Accountability a national network of organizations working to address issues of nuclear weapons production and waste cleanup
http://www.ananuclear.org
for further information, contact:
Nickolas Roth 914-673-6666
Susan Gordon 505-577-8438
or local contacts listed at end of advisory
for immediate release Wednesday, January 27, 2010 WHAT TO LOOK FOR IN THE U.S. DEPT. OF ENERGY FY 2011
NUCLEAR WEAPONS BUDGET REQUEST
The FY 2011 budget request will be released on Monday, February 1,
2010. The Obama administration has laid out an aggressive
nonproliferation agenda that includes deep reductions in nuclear
stockpiles, ratification of a nuclear test ban, and decreased
prominence for nuclear weapons in US defense policy. Despite this
agenda, the Department of Energy’s (DOE) budget request will ask
Congress to significantly increase nuclear weapons activities,
including funding for construction of new facilities that will expand
U.S. warhead production capacity. The DOE request will not reflect
recent independent scientific conclusions that existing nuclear weapons
can be reliably maintained for decades under current, well-established
programs.
The Alliance for Nuclear Accountability (ANA), a
national network representing communities downwind and downstream from
U.S. nuclear weapons facilities, is concerned that increased funding
for nuclear energy and weapons research and production will rob
precious resources for needed environmental cleanup and clean,
sustainable energy solutions. Items of interest:
|
| read more.. |
|
| | | published Monday, September 14, 2009 | 2626 Views :: 3 Comments | Monday, Sep. 14, 2009
By Annette Cary, Tri-City Herald staff writer
Making Hanford the nation's storage site for tons of excess mercury could interfere with environmental cleanup of the site, according to government agencies.
The states of Washington and Oregon, the Hanford Communities and the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation each have submitted written comments to the Department of Energy outlining their concerns.
"It is unacceptable for the nation's leadership to consider sending 12,000 tons of elemental mercury to Hanford when it will be another 50 years before existing waste is cleaned up," the tribes said in a letter to DOE.
DOE is looking across the nation for mercury storage sites after the Mercury Export Ban Act of 2008 prohibited the export of mercury beginning in 2013 and required the agency to have facilities ready to manage and store mercury generated in the United States.
|
| read more.. |
|
| | | published Tuesday, August 11, 2009 | 5691 Views :: 26 Comments | August 11, 2009
By ROGER SNODGRASS, Monitor Editor
There are currently several nails in the coffin of a nuclear policy that has strongly favored commercial reprocessing and recycling of plutonium. Ivan Oelrich wants to make sure it doesn’t pop open again.
A recurring idea in the political tug-of-war between proponents and opponents of nuclear energy, nuclear reprocessing is intended to achieving a plutonium fuel cycle, and thereby provide a plentiful supply of nuclear fuel and a more easily-stored waste product.
Originally published in the Los Alamos Monitor: http://www.lcni5.com/cgi-bin/c2.cgi?075+article+News+20090808213804075075001
|
| read more.. |
|
| | | published Monday, August 10, 2009 | 2911 Views :: 3 Comments | Japan Times, Monday, Aug. 10, 2009
By DAVID JEFFRIES
Kyodo News
HANFORD, Wash. (Kyodo) For Shirley Olinger, managing the cleanup of the Hanford nuclear site —part of the Hanford nuclear site in Washington state that produced the
plutonium for the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki in 1945 — is personal.
Despite these signs of progress, Tom Carpenter, executive director of
the Hanford Challenge, warns that the bulk of the work has yet to be
done.
"I call this 'stopping the bleeding' because it was damaging the
environment," Carpenter said. "But what can we really say about tank
waste? Ninety percent of the Hanford cleanup is this waste. And I think
they are stuck."
Originally published in the Japan Times: http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20090810a8.html
|
| read more.. |
|
| | | published Monday, December 08, 2008 | 11200 Views :: 21 Comments |
WASHINGTON, DC – The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a notification in the Federal Register today that it is extending the comment period on the Draft Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) by 90 days. The public comment period will now end on March 16, 2009.
|
| read more.. |
|
| | | published Monday, December 08, 2008 | 8067 Views :: 10 Comments | Audio transcripts of GNEP hearing in Bolingbrook, Illinois provided by IndyMedia reporter and Greens candidate Rita Sand Maniotis
http://chicago.indymedia.org/media/all/display/31025/index.php
http://chicago.indymedia.org/media/all/display/31026/index.php
http://chicago.indymedia.org/media/all/display/31027/index.php
|
| read more.. |
|
|
 |
|