26 May 2013 Register   Login
Library

ANA in the News
Duke has plans for three new nuclear power plants
published Tuesday, July 03, 2012  803 Views :: 0 Comments

July 2, 2012

By Rudolph Bell
From the Greenville News (SC)

But Duke executives have said the Carolinas’ plants — one near Gaffney and another near Raleigh — won’t get built unless North Carolina lets it recover financing costs from ratepayers up front as South Carolina permits.

Charlotte-based Duke, the Upstate’s dominant electricity provider, and Raleigh-based Progress on Monday jumped the last regulatory hurdle needed to merge and create the nation’s largest regulated utility with more than seven million retail customers in six states.

The two power companies already had permission to combine from federal and North Carolina regulators when the South Carolina Public Service Commission approved a Joint Dispatch Agreement on Monday, paving the way for completion of the merger.

Duke spokesman Tom Williams said a press release wouldn’t be issued until today after all contracts had been signed.

In announcing the merger plans in early 2011, Duke said one of the benefits was that the combined company’s bigger size and scale would put it in a better position to develop new nuclear plants.

The new plants would only be pursued, however, with “appropriate regulatory recovery mechanisms,” Duke told investors.

Williams said recovering financing costs as the plant is built, rather than through cumbersome rate cases, is cheaper for customers and more predictable for utilities.

But Tom Clements, the nonproliferation policy director at the Alliance for Nuclear Accountability, said a coalition is already forming to fight the idea if it surfaces before the North Carolina Legislature next year.

Clements, of Columbia, said he expects the combined company to delay or cancel some of the nuclear construction plans announced by Duke and Progress separately.

“The economics of cheap gas and reduced electricity consumption alone make three new nuclear projects very unrealistic,” Clements said.
He also said schedule delays and costs increases at two nuclear plants under construction by other companies — one being built by South Carolina Electric & Gas near Columbia and one by Southern Co. near Augusta, Ga. — should make utilities cautious.

Duke and Progress already operate seven nuclear plants — one in Florida and six in the Carolinas, including the three-reactor Oconee Nuclear Station on the shores of Lake Keowee.

They filed applications separately with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to build three more, including the two-reactor Lee Nuclear Station near Gaffney.

The combined company will be called Duke Energy and be based in Charlotte.

Its service territory will cover almost all of North Carolina and the central portions of Indiana and Florida as well as small pieces of Ohio and Kentucky.

In South Carolina, the new Duke will provide electricity to 730,000 retail customers across the Upstate and Pee Dee regions, with its state headquarters in downtown Greenville.

Dukes Scott, executive director of South Carolina’s Office of Regulatory Staff, the state agency responsible for protecting the public interest in utility matters, said South Carolina ratepayers will save $198 million because of his agency’s intervention in the merger plans.

Most of the money is fuel savings as the two companies coordinate their operations in South Carolina, he said.




 



© 2013 Alliance for Nuclear Accountability   |  Citadel Hosting  |  Terms Of Use  |  Privacy Statement