 |
|
|
| | | published Thursday, June 30, 2011 | 420 Views :: 0 Comments | |  |
Wednesday, June
29, 2011 Trip Jennings The New Mexican
Preliminary
results of air samples Wednesday showed no nuclear or chemical
contamination, and there is now very little chance the Las Conchas
Fire will move onto Los Alamos National Laboratory property,
officials said Wednesday.
"What we see in this fire is
exactly what see in any fire across New Mexico," LANL Director
Charles McMillan said during a midday news conference regarding
samples taken from one high-volume air monitor. "To me, that is
very encouraging."
Later in the day, the lab issued a
news release stating that preliminary results of samples taken from
seven high-volume air monitors showed no air contamination.
And
Wednesday night, Los Alamos County Fire Chief Doug Tucker said t
preventive burns just outside the western boundary of the lab had
worked.
"In my professional opinion, there is a less
than 10 percent chance of spot fires on lab property this evening,
diminishing tomorrow," Tucker said.
The announcements
came on a day when the Los Alamos facility found itself the subject
of criticism from a well-known theoretical physicist who questioned
how well the lab has stored nuclear materials.
Michio Kaku, a
co-founder of string theory and host of Sci Fi Science on the Science
Channel, in recent days has been quoted in stories by CNN and other
news outlets questioning the lab's vigilance.
On one level,
remarks by a scientist of Kaku's renown demonstrate how the Las
Conchas Fire and its proximity to a lab so inextricably linked to the
U.S.'s bomb-making program has grabbed national and international
media attention in recent days. On Wednesday night, a story about the
Las Conchas Fire was on the BBC website's home page.
On
another level, Kaku's remarks formed part of an ongoing conversation
among some who fear the fire's ability to march onto lab property and
wreak havoc with materials most of humanity knows little about.
If
the fire raged out of control and burned lab buildings, Kaku told one
interviewer, plutonium particulates could spew into the atmosphere
and contaminate the air.
"They have to do tests on
plutonium, on radioactive isotopes, and that is a cause of concern
because if the fire gets really out of control, even buildings that
are totally locked down could suffer a breach," Kaku told
KOAT-TV earlier this week. "That is something we have to take
seriously."
Kaku also questioned how the lab was storing
transuranic radioactive waste at Area G. About 10,000 of the
containers of low-level waste are stored above ground under fabric
domes, and 6,000 are "retrievably" buried, a lab official
said earlier this week. The containers have not been tested for their
ability to withstand a wildfire, but the area around the containers
is barren and mostly paved.
Lab officials pushed back against
Kaku's pronouncements, saying the nuclear materials are very well
secured.
"We are considered the world's expert on
nuclear storage," LANL spokesman Kevin Roark said. "People
come to us about how to do it."
The lab stores plutonium
at Technical Area 55, in what is "essentially a vault"
underground, Roark said.
The materials are "stored in a
variety of ways, including safety-rated canisters," Roark said.
"It looks like a can. It's made out of stainless steel with a
high-tech lid. They vary in sizes."
The "whole
facility is protected against internal fire," Roark added.
The
buildings storing this material, meanwhile, are "hard concrete
buildings, very sturdy," Carl Beard, the lab's principal
associate director for business and operations, said during a midday
news conference in Los Alamos. "They can withstand fire."
The areas also have been cleared of brush and trees that the
fire could use as fuel, Beard said.
"We don't count on
one layer of defense. ... It's multiple layers of defense," he
said.
Contact Trip Jennings at 986-3050 or attjennings@sfnewmexican.com.
|
| Comments | Currently, there are no comments. Be the first to post one!
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can login here |
|
 |
|