9 February 2012
Register
Login
Welcome
Issues
Library
Network
About ANA
Press Room
DC Days
Educational Resources
Calendar
Library
Categories
ANA in the News (163)
Budget Battles (84)
Complex Modernization (104)
DC Days Advocacy Event (10)
Department of Energy (162)
Environmental Cleanup (123)
Fact Sheet (40)
Faith Based (1)
Fallout (8)
Fernald (4)
Front Page (267)
Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (27)
Greater-Than-Class-C (GTCC) Radioactive Waste (14)
Hanford Reservation (43)
Health (59)
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (9)
Iodine-131 (4)
Kansas City Plant (36)
Legacy Management (12)
Life Extension Program (37)
Livermore National Laboratory (28)
Los Alamos National Laboratory (73)
Mound Facility (3)
MOX Plutonium Fuel (9)
Nevada Test Site (17)
Nuclear Energy (74)
Nuclear Waste (122)
Nuclear Weapons (186)
Oak Ridge Reservation (29)
Organizing Resources (19)
Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (5)
Pantex Plant (11)
Plutonium (84)
Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (5)
Press Releases (67)
Public Participation Opportunities (EIS's/Comments for the record) (4)
Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (4)
Reliable Replacement Warhead Program (29)
Report Card (1)
Reprocessing (38)
Rocky Flats Site (9)
Sandia National Laboratory (4)
Savannah River Site (29)
Spent Fuel Management (24)
Stockpile Stewardship (46)
Thyroid Cancer (9)
Tritium (6)
Waste Isolation Pilot Project (13)
Water Contamination (39)
Worker Compensation (11)
Yucca Mountain (20)
ANA in the News
Current Articles
|
Search
|
Syndication
Congress Rejects Money for Enhanced Warhead Designs
published Tuesday, February 17, 2009
3054 Views ::
0
Comments
Congress refused to fund production of the last two new nuclear warheads proposed by DOE—the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (“Bunker Buster”) and the Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW). At the same time, DOE is making an end run around the Congressional rejection of new nuclear weapons by modifying the W76 through its Life Extension Program.
The FY 2008 LEP budget is $234 million; for FY 2009: $211 million. The decrease reflects the completion of the B61 LEP, but the W76 LEP is now ramping up. Additional monies may be included in other parts of the DOE budget.
DOE just finished a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for “Complex Transformation.” The estimated cost for refurbishing the nuclear weapons complex is more than $150 billion. Despite claims that the overall “footprint” of the complex will be reduced, the eight production sites will all add manufacturing facilities in order to construct new design nuclear weapons. This plan is in addition to the current Life Extension programs which are already in place and the Stockpile Stewardship Programs that annually certify that the nuclear arsenal is safe and secure.
-From ANA's 2008 DC Days Fact Sheet
Comments
Currently, there are no comments. Be the first to post one!
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can login
here
DC Days 2011
Reactors and Radioactive Waste
U.S. Nuclear Weapons
High Risk Report - Nuclear Reality Check$: The U.S. Department of Energy's Most Dangerous Budget-Busting Projects
© 2012 Alliance for Nuclear Accountability
|
Citadel Hosting
|
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Statement