 |
|
|
| | | published Thursday, October 23, 2008 | 2112 Views :: 0 Comments | |  |
Text:
Ted Wyka, NA-101
Complex Transformation
Comment
1000 Independence Ave., SW
Washington D.C., 20585
Dear Mr. Wyka,
I am writing in response to the release of the Final Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Complex Transformation. This is a fiscally irresponsible, unnecessary, and dangerous plan that takes our country in the wrong direction. At a time when the U.S. is trying to convince other countries not to develop nuclear weapons, Complex Transformation sends the wrong message to the international community
DOE should adopt a “curatorship” approach that, consistent with U.S. obligation under Article VI of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, would increase dismantlement while ramping down the complex. This approach would accomplish the major stated goals of Complex Transformation that includes ensured safety/reliability of the stockpile (consisting of previously tested designs), no return to testing, increased dismantlement, removal of dangerous/vulnerable nuclear materials from many sites, and economic/programmatic efficiency.
Sincerely,
Address:
City/State:
|
| Comments |
Currently, there are no comments. Be the first to post one!
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can login here |
|
 |
|