10 February 2012
Register
Login
Welcome
Issues
Library
Network
About ANA
Press Room
DC Days
Educational Resources
Calendar
Library
Categories
ANA in the News (164)
Budget Battles (85)
Complex Modernization (104)
DC Days Advocacy Event (10)
Department of Energy (162)
Environmental Cleanup (123)
Fact Sheet (40)
Faith Based (1)
Fallout (8)
Fernald (4)
Front Page (268)
Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (27)
Greater-Than-Class-C (GTCC) Radioactive Waste (14)
Hanford Reservation (43)
Health (59)
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (9)
Iodine-131 (4)
Kansas City Plant (36)
Legacy Management (12)
Life Extension Program (37)
Livermore National Laboratory (28)
Los Alamos National Laboratory (73)
Mound Facility (3)
MOX Plutonium Fuel (10)
Nevada Test Site (17)
Nuclear Energy (75)
Nuclear Waste (122)
Nuclear Weapons (187)
Oak Ridge Reservation (29)
Organizing Resources (19)
Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (5)
Pantex Plant (11)
Plutonium (85)
Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (5)
Press Releases (67)
Public Participation Opportunities (EIS's/Comments for the record) (4)
Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (4)
Reliable Replacement Warhead Program (29)
Report Card (1)
Reprocessing (38)
Rocky Flats Site (9)
Sandia National Laboratory (4)
Savannah River Site (30)
Spent Fuel Management (24)
Stockpile Stewardship (46)
Thyroid Cancer (9)
Tritium (6)
Waste Isolation Pilot Project (13)
Water Contamination (39)
Worker Compensation (11)
Yucca Mountain (20)
ANA in the News
Current Articles
|
Search
|
Syndication
Comments on Greater-Than Class C Waste
published Saturday, July 07, 2007
1203 Views ::
0
Comments
Sample Scoping Comments for DOE’s GTCC Environmental Impact Statement
Greater-Than-Class-C (GTCC) wastes are the most radioactive form of Low-Level Waste (LLW) and are dangerous for hundreds of years. DOE will be choosing one or more locations to bury GTCC radioactive wastes using one or more disposal methods. These radioactive wastes must be handled in a manner that is safe and secure for future generations. Environmental Impact Statements are required by NEPA for all major proposed federal actions. This is your chance to comment on the Department of Energy’s latest proposal to handle GTCC radioactive wastes.
Suggested sample comments follow.
• Analyze hardened on-site storage (HOSS): GTCC radioactive wastes must be safely stored
Download PDF:
GTCC/GTCC Sample Comments NWNM.pdf
Comments
Currently, there are no comments. Be the first to post one!
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can login
here
DC Days 2011
Reactors and Radioactive Waste
U.S. Nuclear Weapons
High Risk Report - Nuclear Reality Check$: The U.S. Department of Energy's Most Dangerous Budget-Busting Projects
© 2012 Alliance for Nuclear Accountability
|
Citadel Hosting
|
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Statement