6 January 2009
Login
Welcome
Issues
Library
Network
About ANA
Press Room
DC Days
Report Cards
Library
Categories
ANA in the News (13)
Budget Battles (7)
Complex Transformation (51)
DC Days Advocacy Event (2)
Department of Energy (48)
Environmental Cleanup (25)
Fact Sheet (23)
Faith Based (1)
Fallout (5)
Fernald (2)
Front Page (27)
Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (28)
Greater-Than-Class-C (GTCC) Radioactive Waste (6)
Hanford Reservation (8)
Health (8)
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (3)
Iodine-131 (2)
Kansas City Plant (7)
Legacy Management (2)
Life Extension Program (8)
Livermore National Laboratory (9)
Los Alamos National Laboratory (9)
Mound Facility (2)
Nevada Test Site (7)
Nuclear Energy (21)
Nuclear Power Plants (19)
Nuclear Waste (38)
Nuclear Weapons (51)
Oak Ridge Reservation (5)
Organizing Resources (15)
Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (2)
Pantex Plant (5)
Plutonium (19)
Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (1)
Press Releases (20)
Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (2)
Reliable Replacement Warhead Program (15)
Report Card (1)
Reprocessing (22)
Resources (17)
Rocky Flats Site (1)
Savannah River Site (4)
Spent Fuel Management (4)
Stockpile Stewardship (15)
Thyroid Cancer (5)
Tools (23)
Tritium (2)
Water Contamination (7)
Worker Compensation (3)
Yucca Mountain (8)
Library--Main Repository
Current Articles
|
Search
|
Syndication
Comments on Greater-Than Class C Waste
published Saturday, July 07, 2007
134 Views ::
0
Comments
Sample Scoping Comments for DOE’s GTCC Environmental Impact Statement
Greater-Than-Class-C (GTCC) wastes are the most radioactive form of Low-Level Waste (LLW) and are dangerous for hundreds of years. DOE will be choosing one or more locations to bury GTCC radioactive wastes using one or more disposal methods. These radioactive wastes must be handled in a manner that is safe and secure for future generations. Environmental Impact Statements are required by NEPA for all major proposed federal actions. This is your chance to comment on the Department of Energy’s latest proposal to handle GTCC radioactive wastes.
Suggested sample comments follow.
• Analyze hardened on-site storage (HOSS): GTCC radioactive wastes must be safely stored
Download PDF:
GTCC/GTCC Sample Comments NWNM.pdf
Comments
Currently, there are no comments. Be the first to post one!
Click
here
to post a comment
Fact Sheets 2008
Environmental Cleanup of the Nuclear Weapons Complex
Spent Fuel Reprocessing and the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership
Proposed Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository
Plutonium Disposition: Vitrification vs. MOX Reactor Fuel
The Reliable Replacement Warhead Program and "Complex Transformation"
Nuclear Weapons Policy
Life Extension Programs
Plutonium "Triggers" for Nuclear Bombs
Fact Sheets for 2007
Environmental Cleanup of the Nuclear Weapons Complex
The Reliable Replacement Warhead Program
"Complex 2030" Nuclear Weapons Infrastructure Plan
Spent Fuel Reprocessing and the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership
Proposed Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository
Plutonium in Weapons, Waste, and Reactor Fuel
The Effects of Nuclear Testing on Human Health
© 2009 Alliance for Nuclear Accountability
|
Citadel Hosting
|
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Statement