9 February 2012
Register
Login
Welcome
Issues
Library
Network
About ANA
Press Room
DC Days
Educational Resources
Calendar
Library
Categories
ANA in the News (163)
Budget Battles (84)
Complex Modernization (104)
DC Days Advocacy Event (10)
Department of Energy (162)
Environmental Cleanup (123)
Fact Sheet (40)
Faith Based (1)
Fallout (8)
Fernald (4)
Front Page (267)
Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (27)
Greater-Than-Class-C (GTCC) Radioactive Waste (14)
Hanford Reservation (43)
Health (59)
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (9)
Iodine-131 (4)
Kansas City Plant (36)
Legacy Management (12)
Life Extension Program (37)
Livermore National Laboratory (28)
Los Alamos National Laboratory (73)
Mound Facility (3)
MOX Plutonium Fuel (9)
Nevada Test Site (17)
Nuclear Energy (74)
Nuclear Waste (122)
Nuclear Weapons (186)
Oak Ridge Reservation (29)
Organizing Resources (19)
Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (5)
Pantex Plant (11)
Plutonium (84)
Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (5)
Press Releases (67)
Public Participation Opportunities (EIS's/Comments for the record) (4)
Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (4)
Reliable Replacement Warhead Program (29)
Report Card (1)
Reprocessing (38)
Rocky Flats Site (9)
Sandia National Laboratory (4)
Savannah River Site (29)
Spent Fuel Management (24)
Stockpile Stewardship (46)
Thyroid Cancer (9)
Tritium (6)
Waste Isolation Pilot Project (13)
Water Contamination (39)
Worker Compensation (11)
Yucca Mountain (20)
ANA in the News
Current Articles
|
Search
|
Syndication
GNEP Undermines Nuclear Nonproliferation Efforts
published Wednesday, October 08, 2008
5719 Views ::
0
Comments
GNEP Undermines Nuclear Nonproliferation Efforts
Separating plutonium under GNEP would increase the production and stockpiles of nuclear weapons usable materials. Spent fuel that has not been reprocessed is considered “self protecting” because it is highly radioactive. Separated plutonium is a fine powder, and approximately 18 lbs. are required to make a bomb. The International Atomic Energy Agency already allows for a 3% margin of error in accounting for plutonium in existing reprocessing facilities. All of this increases the risk that material could be lost or diverted by terrorists. In addition, since the announcement of GNEP, several countries that do not currently reprocess spent fuel or enrich uranium have expressed interest in developing the dangerous technologies, and could thereby acquire the ability to produce nuclear weapons-usable material for nuclear weapons.
Comments
Currently, there are no comments. Be the first to post one!
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can login
here
DC Days 2011
Reactors and Radioactive Waste
U.S. Nuclear Weapons
High Risk Report - Nuclear Reality Check$: The U.S. Department of Energy's Most Dangerous Budget-Busting Projects
© 2012 Alliance for Nuclear Accountability
|
Citadel Hosting
|
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Statement